Missouri

  Entertainment Lawyers.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
August 24, 2010
Entertainment
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Entertainment Legal News

 

UCLA Entertainment Law Symposium

Rather than give you a dry recitation of the various legislative proposals in Congress affecting copyright law, I’m going to a dry dissection of a January 5, 2003 L.A. Times editorial entitled “File Sharers: Don’t Crow Yet,” of which you all should have received a copy.  I decided to use this opportunity to discuss that editorial, which just represents so much that is wrong about the debate over piracy, copyright law, and online access to creative works.
 
Judging by the blasting the editorial gives them, the entertainment industries are facing a disastrous public relations situation.  The editorial implies they are technology Luddites, advocates legislation that is absolute anathema to them, accuses them of nefarious motives, celebrates their legal losses, sides with their opponents, and draws every possible inference against them. 
 
If this were an editorial from the San Francisco Chronicle or San Jose Mercury News, it wouldn’t seem so shocking.  After all, similar editorials have appeared in those papers for years as tensions flared between the technology and entertainment industries.  No, what is shocking is that the entertainment industries are now being completely lambasted by the editorial board for what is essentially their home town paper.
 
My concern is that this editorial is not aberrational, but represents the growing conventional wisdom on copyright issues.  And the fact that the public debate on copyright issues has become so skewed is troubling.
 
For the entertainment industries, it is a troubling indication that, despite their PR prowess, they have failed terribly in making their case to the public.  Personally, I find the editorial troubling because the conventional wisdom it represents is deeply flawed, and if followed, will result in disastrous policy-making. Read more at house.gov

 

Contact our Missouri Entertainment Lawyers now and obtain a free case review!

 

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Talent is a factor in entertainment
The general term for an artistic contributor to a project, talent usually refers to actors, directors, and writers. In the studio world, atttaching talent, or bringing necessary key artists to a project, is necessary in getting the film made. Agencies usually reserve the term 'talent' for actors and classify talent agents as those who represent thesipians.

 


  Newsroom  
 


Latest news about Entertainment cases in Missouri and nationwide:

Movie Piracy Operations Net Record 6.7 Million Pirate Discs
Law Enforcement Agencies Conduct 1,919 Raids to Reduce Street Vendor Presence and Boost Legitimate Sales

Hong Kong – Operation Red Card, an...

Read more >


UCLA Entertainment Law Symposium
Rather than give you a dry recitation of the various legislative proposals in Congress affecting copyright law, I’m going to a dry dissection of a ...
Read more >


Wilmington Lodge Sentenced In Federal Court for Conspiring To Conduct an Illegal Gambling Business
Chief U. S. District Judge Terrence W. Boyle imposed a fine of $100,000.00. In accordance with the terms of its plea agreement with the United Stat...
Read more >


More Entertainment News >

 
 

Entertainment Lawyers.com Terms

 


Today's Terms

Billboard

Definition:
A common name for outdoor signs located along streets and highways in either paper or vinyl.

Agent

Definition:
A representative of talent, petitioning, on their behalf, for work within the filmmaking community. Agents, by law, have the right to both solicit employment and negotiate terms for the artists they represent. Not to be confused with Manager.

Use Fees

Definition:
In paid broadcast advertising, the fees paid to performers used in television commercials or radio spots. The fee is based on the number of airplays and the number and size of media markets in which the advertisement will air. Use fees are paid in addition to holding fees.

More Entertainment Lawyers.com Terms >

 

Search Site

 
 

Entertainment Law Resources

 


Search Entertainment Law resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

Entertainment Law Hot Topics

 
Topics Related to Entertainment Law:

  • Trademark Violations
  • Copywriting Infringement
  • Film Finance Negotiations
  • Intellectual Property Theft
  • Plagiarism

More Entertainment Law Topics >

Missouri Entertainment Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Entertainment attorney you should contact our Entertainment Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Arnold
  • Ballwin
  • Belton
  • Blue Springs
  • Cape Girardeau
  • Chesterfield
  • Columbia
  • Fenton
  • Florissant
  • Grandview
  • Independence
  • Jefferson City
  • Joplin
  • Kansas City
  • Lebanon
  • Liberty
  • O Fallon
  • Poplar Bluff
  • Rolla
  • Saint Charles
  • Saint Louis
  • Saint Peters
  • Sedalia
  • Sikeston
  • Springfield
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Missouri Entertainment Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.